The topic: "EPA’s CO2 Regulations for New and Existing Power Plants: Legal Perspectives."
A top EPA air official is defending the agency's greenhouse gas rule for existing power plants from critics' charges that officials used an unprecedented “beyond-the-fence” approach when EPA developed its methods for setting state GHG targets, saying the agency conducted a similar process as it did when it crafted other rules under the same section of the Clean Air Act.
Todd Stern, the State Department's top climate negotiator, is building a defense for a likely decision by the Obama administration to withhold the upcoming Paris climate agreement from Senate ratification, arguing that the agreement will not call for legally binding emissions targets that require approval from lawmakers while rejecting Republican claims that any deal would establish external enforcement of U.S. climate actions.
EPA is stepping up education on the asthma risks of climate change, arguing that rising temperatures and more frequent extreme weather that result from climate change will increase outdoor and indoor air pollution, worsening triggers for asthma attacks, such as greater ground-level ozone and increased mold and pest presence in homes.
Related Story: Scientists Ask NAS To Help Address Climate Attribution Studies' Uncertainty
Three Southeastern states building new nuclear plants are said to favor rate-based compliance plans for EPA's greenhouse gas rule for existing power plants, though observers argue that a much larger pool of states will ultimately opt for mass-based plans, potentially restricting the Southern states' market for selling any excess emission reductions.
The topic: "EPA’s CO2 Regulations for New and Existing Power Plants: Legal Perspectives."
"Yes, coal plants may close, but wind and solar power and energy efficiency will more than make up for any shuttered plants," writes John Moore.
Twenty business groups are criticizing the draft for not providing support for market mechanisms or specifying “rules to account for international emissions reduction unit transfers.”
Highlights from comments submitted by the big three U.S. automakers, a coalition of free-market groups and a cadre of environmental organizations.
Bloomberg Business reports on "talks on setting international rules and guidelines in the event that U.N. climate talks fail to set a framework for such a system."
A study of ecological risks posed by solar, plus more headlines of note.
Putting a price on carbon is needed to help reduce use of fossil fuels, said the group of national and subnational leaders.
Without coordination and broader emission trading markets, one analyst warns, compliance “won't be an economically efficient structure.”
A top Pennsylvania electricity regulator says the Keystone state is unlikely to join the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) as a way to comply with EPA's final power plant GHG rule, though the state is considering other options for joining a regional compliance system, such as one with other states in Pennsylvania's grid.
Arguing autogas, NPGA urges EPA “to recognize” liquefied petroleum gas and propane as “”exceptional” fuels “capable of improving the environmental impact of vehicle emissions.
Don't miss a single story. Sign up to receive e-mail notifications from InsideEPA/climate.
Economical site license packages are available to fit any size organization, from a few people at one location to company-wide access. For more information on how you can get greater access to InsideEPAclimate.com for your office, contact Online Customer Service at 703-416-8505 or climate@iwpnews.com.
© 2015. Inside Washington Publishers | Contact Us